Screener
SPDF vs DFAT
Defender Risk Adaptive 500 ETF vs Dimensional U.S. Targeted Value ETF
Key differences
- DFAT costs 0.41% less per year.
- DFAT is significantly larger than SPDF — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- DFAT has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| SPDF | DFAT | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.69% | 0.28% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $5M | $13.7B |
| Since | 2026 | 1998 |
| Dividend yield | — | 1.45% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +33.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +17.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.74 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 16.99% |
| Max drawdown | -1.90% | -26.12% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to SPDF and DFAT
Explore further