Screener
SPDF vs DFAW
Defender Risk Adaptive 500 ETF vs Dimensional World Equity ETF
Key differences
- DFAW costs 0.45% less per year.
- DFAW is significantly larger than SPDF — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- SPDF follows a active selection strategy; DFAW uses index tracking.
Side-by-side comparison
| SPDF | DFAW | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.69% | 0.24% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $5M | $1.3B |
| Since | 2026 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | — | 1.31% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +30.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 12.13% |
| Max drawdown | -1.90% | -16.94% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to SPDF and DFAW
Explore further