Screener
SPDF vs FFLV
Defender Risk Adaptive 500 ETF vs Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap
Key differences
- FFLV costs 0.31% less per year.
- FFLV is significantly larger than SPDF — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- SPDF covers north america markets; FFLV covers global.
Side-by-side comparison
| SPDF | FFLV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.69% | 0.38% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $5M | $17M |
| Since | 2026 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | — | 1.48% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | global |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +28.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 11.50% |
| Max drawdown | -1.90% | -16.71% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to SPDF and FFLV
Explore further