Screener
SPDF vs FMDE
Defender Risk Adaptive 500 ETF vs Fidelity Enhanced Mid Cap Core ETF
Key differences
- FMDE costs 0.46% less per year.
- FMDE is significantly larger than SPDF — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- SPDF follows a active selection strategy; FMDE uses index enhanced.
- FMDE has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| SPDF | FMDE | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.69% | 0.23% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $5M | $6.5B |
| Since | 2026 | 2007 |
| Dividend yield | — | 1.15% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index enhanced |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +20.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 13.71% |
| Max drawdown | -1.90% | -21.10% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to SPDF and FMDE
Explore further