Screener
SPDN vs HIBL
Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bear 1X Shares vs Direxion Daily S&P 500 High Beta Bull 3X Shares
Key differences
- SPDN costs 0.50% less per year.
- SPDN follows a inverse strategy; HIBL uses leveraged.
- Over the last 3 years, HIBL has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| SPDN | HIBL | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.48% | 0.98% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $219M | $83M |
| Since | 2016 | 2019 |
| Dividend yield | 3.94% | 1.66% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | inverse | leveraged |
| CAGR 1Y | -18.4% | +242.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | -13.2% | +60.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | -9.3% | +8.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | -1.11 | 0.96 |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.30% | 66.14% |
| Max drawdown | -75.08% | -88.27% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to SPDN and HIBL
Explore further