Screener
SPDW vs XCNY
State Street SPDR Portfolio Developed World ex-US ETF vs State Street SPDR S&P Emerging Markets ex-China ETF
Key differences
- SPDW costs 0.16% less per year.
- SPDW is significantly larger than XCNY — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- SPDW covers global ex us markets; XCNY covers emerging markets.
- SPDW has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| SPDW | XCNY | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.03% | 0.19% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $38.9B | $9M |
| Since | 2007 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | 3.00% | 2.41% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global ex us | emerging markets |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +32.2% | +32.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +18.9% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +9.7% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.98 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.57% | 16.39% |
| Max drawdown | -34.98% | -19.70% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to SPDW and XCNY
Explore further