Screener
SPEM vs EMM
State Street SPDR Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF vs Global X Emerging Markets ex-China ETF
Key differences
- SPEM costs 0.59% less per year.
- SPEM is significantly larger than EMM — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- SPEM follows a index tracking strategy; EMM uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, EMM has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| SPEM | EMM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.07% | 0.66% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $17.3B | $58M |
| Since | 2007 | 2010 |
| Dividend yield | 2.58% | 0.76% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | emerging markets | emerging markets |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +30.3% | +54.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +19.0% | +20.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | +6.6% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.95 | 0.90 |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.88% | 21.25% |
| Max drawdown | -36.06% | -21.99% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to SPEM and EMM
Explore further