Screener
SPEM vs FFEM
State Street SPDR Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF vs Fidelity Fundamental Emerging M
Key differences
- SPEM costs 0.53% less per year.
- SPEM is significantly larger than FFEM — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- SPEM has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| SPEM | FFEM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.07% | 0.60% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $17.3B | $39M |
| Since | 2007 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | 2.58% | 1.32% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | emerging markets | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +27.2% | +57.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +17.9% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +6.5% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.89 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.75% | 21.16% |
| Max drawdown | -36.06% | -16.29% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to SPEM and FFEM
Explore further