Screener
SPFF vs EDGQ
Global X SuperIncome Preferred ETF vs Global X Nasdaq-100 Income Edge ETF
Key differences
- SPFF is classified as fixed income, while EDGQ is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- SPFF follows a index tracking strategy; EDGQ uses active selection.
Side-by-side comparison
| SPFF | EDGQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.48% | — |
| Fund size (AUM) | $148M | — |
| Since | 2012 | — |
| Dividend yield | 6.43% | — |
| Asset class | fixed income | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +16.6% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +9.6% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +2.0% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.60 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 9.51% | — |
| Max drawdown | -35.92% | -7.84% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to SPFF and EDGQ
Explore further