Screener
SPFF vs FIGB
Global X SuperIncome Preferred ETF vs Fidelity Investment Grade Bond ETF
Key differences
Both SPFF and FIGB are fixed income ETFs. SPFF charges 0.48% a year and FIGB 0.36%. The main difference: SPFF follows a index tracking strategy; FIGB uses active selection.
- SPFF follows a index tracking strategy; FIGB uses active selection.
- FIGB costs 0.12% less per year.
- FIGB is much larger than SPFF. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last three years, SPFF has delivered higher annualized returns.
- SPFF has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| SPFF | FIGB | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.48% | 0.36% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $144M | $499M |
| Since | 2012 | 2021 |
| Dividend yield | 6.32% | 4.11% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +16.2% | +4.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | +8.6% | +4.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | +1.9% | +0.3% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.51 | 0.14 |
| Volatility 1Y | 9.85% | 4.10% |
| Max drawdown | -35.92% | -18.08% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.