Screener
SPFF vs PFFV
Global X SuperIncome Preferred ETF vs Global X Variable Rate Preferred ETF
Key differences
- PFFV costs 0.23% less per year.
- SPFF has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| SPFF | PFFV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.48% | 0.25% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $148M | $302M |
| Since | 2012 | 2020 |
| Dividend yield | 6.43% | 8.13% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +16.6% | +5.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +9.6% | +8.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | +2.0% | +2.6% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.60 | 0.79 |
| Volatility 1Y | 9.51% | 4.20% |
| Max drawdown | -35.92% | -18.95% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to SPFF and PFFV
Explore further