Screener
SPFF vs PGF
Global X SuperIncome Preferred ETF vs Invesco Financial Preferred ETF
Key differences
- SPFF costs 0.07% less per year.
- PGF is significantly larger than SPFF — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- SPFF is classified as fixed income, while PGF is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- Over the last 3 years, SPFF has delivered higher annualized returns.
- PGF has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| SPFF | PGF | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.48% | 0.55% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $148M | $719M |
| Since | 2012 | 2006 |
| Dividend yield | 6.43% | 6.24% |
| Asset class | fixed income | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +16.6% | +5.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | +9.6% | +5.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | +2.0% | -0.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.60 | 0.23 |
| Volatility 1Y | 9.51% | 6.36% |
| Max drawdown | -35.92% | -28.92% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to SPFF and PGF
Explore further