Screener
SPGM vs QEMM
State Street SPDR Portfolio MSCI Global Stock Market ETF vs State Street SPDR MSCI Emerging Markets StrategicFactors ETF
Key differences
- SPGM costs 0.21% less per year.
- SPGM is significantly larger than QEMM — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- SPGM is classified as equity, while QEMM is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- SPGM covers global markets; QEMM covers emerging markets.
- Over the last 3 years, SPGM has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| SPGM | QEMM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.09% | 0.30% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.6B | $47M |
| Since | 2012 | 2014 |
| Dividend yield | 1.75% | 4.27% |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | global | emerging markets |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +33.8% | +36.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +21.9% | +18.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | +12.0% | +7.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.20 | 0.96 |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.96% | 16.31% |
| Max drawdown | -33.97% | -36.89% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to SPGM and QEMM
Explore further