Screener
SPGM vs XME
State Street SPDR Portfolio MSCI Global Stock Market ETF vs State Street SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF
Key differences
- SPGM costs 0.26% less per year.
- XME is significantly larger than SPGM — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- SPGM covers global markets; XME covers north america.
- Over the last 3 years, XME has delivered higher annualized returns.
- XME has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| SPGM | XME | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.09% | 0.35% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.6B | $5.3B |
| Since | 2012 | 2006 |
| Dividend yield | 1.75% | 0.32% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +33.8% | +106.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | +21.9% | +38.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | +12.0% | +23.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.20 | 1.13 |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.96% | 34.35% |
| Max drawdown | -33.97% | -61.69% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to SPGM and XME
Explore further