Screener
SPHD vs SMDV
Invesco S&P 500 High Dividend Low Volatility ETF vs ProShares Russell 2000 Dividend Growers ETF
Key differences
- SPHD costs 0.10% less per year.
- SPHD is significantly larger than SMDV — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, SPHD has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| SPHD | SMDV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.30% | 0.40% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $3.3B | $661M |
| Since | 2012 | 2015 |
| Dividend yield | 4.37% | 2.38% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +12.6% | +15.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | +12.2% | +10.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | +6.2% | +4.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.69 | 0.44 |
| Volatility 1Y | 11.06% | 15.90% |
| Max drawdown | -41.39% | -34.12% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to SPHD and SMDV
Explore further