Screener
SPHQ vs QVMS
Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF vs Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 QVM Multi-factor ETF
Key differences
- SPHQ is significantly larger than QVMS — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, SPHQ has delivered higher annualized returns.
- SPHQ has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| SPHQ | QVMS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.15% | 0.15% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $17.3B | $232M |
| Since | 2005 | 2021 |
| Dividend yield | 1.11% | 1.15% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +24.7% | +36.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +22.7% | +16.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | +15.0% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.27 | 0.68 |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.73% | 17.78% |
| Max drawdown | -31.59% | -28.05% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to SPHQ and QVMS
Explore further