Screener
SPIB vs NEAR
State Street SPDR Portfolio Intermediate Term Corporate Bond ETF vs iShares Short Duration Bond Active ETF
Key differences
- SPIB costs 0.21% less per year.
- SPIB follows a index tracking strategy; NEAR uses active selection.
Side-by-side comparison
| SPIB | NEAR | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.04% | 0.25% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $11.0B | $4.3B |
| Since | 2009 | 2013 |
| Dividend yield | 4.43% | 4.48% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +5.8% | +4.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +5.8% | +5.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | +1.9% | +3.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.58 | 1.23 |
| Volatility 1Y | 2.85% | 1.37% |
| Max drawdown | -14.94% | -9.61% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to SPIB and NEAR
Explore further