Screener
SPTI vs ICSH
State Street SPDR Portfolio Intermediate Term Treasury ETF vs iShares Ultra Short Duration Bond Active ETF
Key differences
- SPTI costs 0.05% less per year.
- SPTI follows a index tracking strategy; ICSH uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, ICSH has delivered higher annualized returns.
- SPTI has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| SPTI | ICSH | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.03% | 0.08% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $10.1B | $7.3B |
| Since | 2007 | 2013 |
| Dividend yield | 3.82% | 4.41% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +4.0% | +4.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +3.0% | +5.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | +0.1% | +3.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | -0.11 | 3.35 |
| Volatility 1Y | 3.44% | 0.41% |
| Max drawdown | -16.11% | -3.94% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to SPTI and ICSH
Explore further