Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

SPTI vs SCHQ

State Street SPDR Portfolio Intermediate Term Treasury ETF vs Schwab Long-Term U.S. Treasury ETF

SPTI

State Street SPDR Portfolio Intermediate Term Treasury ETF

State Street Investment Management

Annual cost

0.03%

Fund size

$10.1B

SCHQ

Schwab Long-Term U.S. Treasury ETF

Schwab ETFs

Annual cost

0.03%

Fund size

$897M

Key differences

  • SPTI is significantly larger than SCHQ — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
  • Over the last 3 years, SPTI has delivered higher annualized returns.
  • SPTI has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.

Side-by-side comparison

SPTISCHQ
Annual cost (TER)0.03%0.03%
Fund size (AUM)$10.1B$897M
Since20072019
Dividend yield3.82%4.76%
Asset classfixed incomefixed income
Regionnorth americanorth america
Strategyindex trackingindex tracking
CAGR 1Y+4.0%+5.6%
CAGR 3Y+3.0%-1.3%
CAGR 5Y+0.1%-5.1%
Sharpe 3Y-0.11-0.31
Volatility 1Y3.44%9.07%
Max drawdown-16.11%-46.13%

Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.

Similar to SPTI and SCHQ