Skip to content
Screener

SPTM vs KOMP

State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF vs State Street SPDR S&P Kensho New Economies Composite ETF

SPTM

State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF

Annual cost

0.03%

Fund size

$13.6B

KOMP

State Street SPDR S&P Kensho New Economies Composite ETF

Annual cost

0.20%

Fund size

$3.0B

Key differences

Both SPTM and KOMP are equity ETFs. SPTM charges 0.03% a year and KOMP 0.20%. The main difference: SPTM covers North America; KOMP covers global markets.

  • SPTM covers North America; KOMP covers global markets.
  • SPTM costs 0.17% less per year.
  • SPTM is much larger than KOMP. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
  • Over the last three years, SPTM has delivered higher annualized returns.
  • SPTM has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.

Side-by-side comparison

SPTMKOMP
Annual cost (TER)0.03%0.20%
Fund size (AUM)$13.6B$3.0B
Since20002018
Dividend yield1.04%1.42%
Asset classequityequity
Regionnorth americaglobal
Strategyindex trackingindex tracking
CAGR 1Y+25.1%+36.1%
CAGR 3Y+21.4%+19.3%
CAGR 5Y+13.1%+2.2%
Sharpe 3Y1.140.72
Volatility 1Y12.34%24.57%
Max drawdown-34.67%-50.06%

Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.

Similar to SPTM and KOMP