Screener
SPUS vs CEFA
SP Funds S&P 500 Sharia Industry Exclusions ETF vs Global X S&P Catholic Values Developed ex-U.S. ETF
Key differences
- CEFA costs 0.10% less per year.
- SPUS is significantly larger than CEFA — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- SPUS covers north america markets; CEFA covers global.
- Over the last 3 years, SPUS has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| SPUS | CEFA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.45% | 0.35% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2.4B | $46M |
| Since | 2019 | 2020 |
| Dividend yield | 0.57% | 2.71% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +39.1% | +19.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | +25.4% | +14.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | +17.2% | +7.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.18 | 0.70 |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.25% | 15.37% |
| Max drawdown | -30.80% | -31.97% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to SPUS and CEFA
Explore further