Screener
SPXN vs SPUS
ProShares S&P 500 ex-Financials ETF vs SP Funds S&P 500 Sharia Industry Exclusions ETF
Key differences
- SPXN costs 0.36% less per year.
- SPUS is significantly larger than SPXN — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, SPUS has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| SPXN | SPUS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.09% | 0.45% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $74M | $2.4B |
| Since | 2015 | 2019 |
| Dividend yield | 0.93% | 0.57% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +33.8% | +39.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | +24.0% | +25.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | +14.9% | +17.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.24 | 1.18 |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.83% | 14.25% |
| Max drawdown | -32.10% | -30.80% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to SPXN and SPUS
Explore further