Screener
SPXN vs XOEF
ProShares S&P 500 ex-Financials ETF vs iShares S&P 500 ex S&P 100 ETF
Key differences
- SPXN costs 0.11% less per year.
- SPXN is significantly larger than XOEF — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- SPXN has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| SPXN | XOEF | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.09% | 0.20% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $74M | $20M |
| Since | 2015 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 0.93% | — |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +33.8% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +24.0% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +14.9% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.24 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.83% | — |
| Max drawdown | -32.10% | -7.66% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to SPXN and XOEF
Explore further