Screener
SPYC vs CTAP
Simplify US Equity PLUS Convexity ETF vs Simplify US Equity PLUS Managed Futures Strategy ETF
Key differences
- SPYC follows a option income strategy; CTAP uses managed futures.
Side-by-side comparison
| SPYC | CTAP | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.53% | — |
| Fund size (AUM) | $100M | — |
| Since | 2020 | — |
| Dividend yield | 0.92% | — |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | option income | managed futures |
| CAGR 1Y | +16.4% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +20.0% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +10.1% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.82 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.75% | — |
| Max drawdown | -28.51% | -9.02% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to SPYC and CTAP
Explore further