Screener
SPYM vs CATH
State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF vs Global X S&P 500 Catholic Values ETF
Key differences
- SPYM costs 0.27% less per year.
- SPYM is significantly larger than CATH — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, SPYM has delivered higher annualized returns.
- SPYM has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| SPYM | CATH | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.02% | 0.29% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $137.6B | $1.2B |
| Since | 2005 | 2016 |
| Dividend yield | 1.05% | 0.80% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +31.2% | +27.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +23.1% | +21.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | +14.4% | +13.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.25 | 1.13 |
| Volatility 1Y | 11.95% | 12.32% |
| Max drawdown | -33.87% | -33.95% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to SPYM and CATH
Explore further