Screener
SPYM vs SPXN
State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF vs ProShares S&P 500 ex-Financials ETF
Key differences
- SPYM costs 0.07% less per year.
- SPYM is significantly larger than SPXN — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- SPYM has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| SPYM | SPXN | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.02% | 0.09% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $137.6B | $74M |
| Since | 2005 | 2015 |
| Dividend yield | 1.05% | 0.93% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +29.4% | +33.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | +23.2% | +24.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | +14.0% | +14.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.25 | 1.24 |
| Volatility 1Y | 11.96% | 12.83% |
| Max drawdown | -33.87% | -32.10% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to SPYM and SPXN
Explore further