Screener
SQLT vs QINT
Ishares MSCI USA Small-Cap Quality Factor ETF vs American Century Quality Diversified International ETF
Key differences
- SQLT costs 0.14% less per year.
- QINT is significantly larger than SQLT — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- SQLT covers north america markets; QINT covers global.
- QINT has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| SQLT | QINT | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.20% | 0.34% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $7M | $590M |
| Since | 2026 | 2018 |
| Dividend yield | — | 2.54% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +26.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +20.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +9.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.08 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 14.85% |
| Max drawdown | -3.95% | -33.86% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to SQLT and QINT
Explore further