Screener
SRET vs EFAS
Global X SuperDividend REIT ETF vs Global X MSCI SuperDividend EAFE ETF
Key differences
- SRET is significantly larger than EFAS — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, EFAS has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| SRET | EFAS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.58% | 0.55% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $237M | $48M |
| Since | 2015 | 2016 |
| Dividend yield | 7.74% | 4.48% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +19.9% | +33.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +10.9% | +24.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | +2.2% | +12.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.53 | 1.42 |
| Volatility 1Y | 11.33% | 10.62% |
| Max drawdown | -66.98% | -44.39% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to SRET and EFAS
Explore further