Screener
SSO vs SH
ProShares Ultra S&P500 vs ProShares Short S&P500
Key differences
- SSO is significantly larger than SH — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- SSO follows a leveraged strategy; SH uses inverse.
- Over the last 3 years, SSO has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| SSO | SH | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.87% | 0.89% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $7.3B | $1.2B |
| Since | 2006 | 2006 |
| Dividend yield | 0.68% | 4.32% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | leveraged | inverse |
| CAGR 1Y | +60.1% | -19.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | +39.1% | -13.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | +20.7% | -9.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.15 | -1.15 |
| Volatility 1Y | 23.92% | 11.96% |
| Max drawdown | -59.34% | -75.87% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to SSO and SH
Explore further