Screener
SSO vs SZK
ProShares Ultra S&P500 vs ProShares UltraShort Consumer Staples
Key differences
- SSO costs 0.08% less per year.
- SSO is significantly larger than SZK — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- SSO follows a leveraged strategy; SZK uses inverse.
- Over the last 3 years, SSO has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| SSO | SZK | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.87% | 0.95% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $7.3B | $5M |
| Since | 2006 | 2007 |
| Dividend yield | 0.68% | 2.80% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | leveraged | inverse |
| CAGR 1Y | +60.1% | -6.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | +39.1% | -4.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | +20.7% | -5.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.15 | -0.21 |
| Volatility 1Y | 23.92% | 24.93% |
| Max drawdown | -59.34% | -86.79% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to SSO and SZK
Explore further