Screener
STOT vs TUGN
State Street DoubleLine Short Duration Total Return Tactical ETF vs STF Tactical Growth & Income ETF
Key differences
- STOT costs 0.20% less per year.
- STOT is significantly larger than TUGN — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- STOT is classified as fixed income, while TUGN is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- STOT follows a index tracking strategy; TUGN uses option income.
- Over the last 3 years, TUGN has delivered higher annualized returns.
- STOT has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| STOT | TUGN | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.45% | 0.65% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $428M | $78M |
| Since | 2016 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | 4.40% | 11.46% |
| Asset class | fixed income | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | option income |
| CAGR 1Y | +4.5% | +35.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | +5.4% | +24.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | +2.8% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.07 | 1.10 |
| Volatility 1Y | 1.38% | 15.35% |
| Max drawdown | -6.07% | -23.45% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to STOT and TUGN
Explore further