Screener
STRN vs SCHG
SMART Trend 25 ETF vs Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF
Key differences
- STRN follows a active selection strategy; SCHG uses index tracking.
Side-by-side comparison
| STRN | SCHG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | — | 0.04% |
| Fund size (AUM) | — | $55.6B |
| Since | — | 2009 |
| Dividend yield | — | 0.38% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +28.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +26.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +16.3% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.14 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 15.57% |
| Max drawdown | -15.43% | -34.59% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to STRN and SCHG
Explore further