Screener
STXV vs FFLV
Strive 1000 Value ETF vs Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap
Key differences
- STXV costs 0.20% less per year.
- STXV is significantly larger than FFLV — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- STXV covers north america markets; FFLV covers global.
- STXV follows a index tracking strategy; FFLV uses active selection.
Side-by-side comparison
| STXV | FFLV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.18% | 0.38% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $78M | $17M |
| Since | 2022 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | 2.28% | 1.48% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +29.5% | +29.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | +18.2% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.10 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 10.22% | 11.50% |
| Max drawdown | -14.80% | -16.71% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to STXV and FFLV
Explore further