Screener
STXV vs IWB
Strive 1000 Value ETF vs iShares Russell 1000 ETF
Key differences
- IWB is significantly larger than STXV — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, IWB has delivered higher annualized returns.
- IWB has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| STXV | IWB | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.18% | 0.15% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $78M | $46.2B |
| Since | 2022 | 2000 |
| Dividend yield | 2.28% | 0.96% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +29.5% | +29.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | +18.2% | +22.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +13.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.10 | 1.21 |
| Volatility 1Y | 10.22% | 12.07% |
| Max drawdown | -14.80% | -34.60% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to STXV and IWB
Explore further