Screener
SUB vs INMU
iShares Short-Term National Muni Bond ETF vs iShares Intermediate Muni Income Active ETF
Key differences
- SUB costs 0.23% less per year.
- SUB is significantly larger than INMU — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, INMU has delivered higher annualized returns.
- SUB has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| SUB | INMU | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.07% | 0.30% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $11.1B | $457M |
| Since | 2008 | 2021 |
| Dividend yield | 2.48% | 3.37% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +3.1% | +6.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +3.0% | +4.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | +1.4% | +1.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | -0.39 | 0.17 |
| Volatility 1Y | 1.00% | 2.50% |
| Max drawdown | -9.46% | -10.66% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to SUB and INMU
Explore further