Screener
SUB vs PZT
iShares Short-Term National Muni Bond ETF vs Invesco New York AMT-Free Municipal Bond ETF
Key differences
- SUB costs 0.21% less per year.
- SUB is significantly larger than PZT — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
Side-by-side comparison
| SUB | PZT | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.07% | 0.28% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $11.1B | $130M |
| Since | 2008 | 2007 |
| Dividend yield | 2.48% | 3.57% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +3.2% | +8.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +3.2% | +3.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | +1.4% | -0.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | -0.26 | 0.02 |
| Volatility 1Y | 1.01% | 4.70% |
| Max drawdown | -9.46% | -19.28% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to SUB and PZT
Explore further