Screener
SUSA vs DMXF
iShares ESG Optimized MSCI USA ETF vs iShares ESG Advanced MSCI EAFE Index ETF
Key differences
- DMXF costs 0.13% less per year.
- SUSA is significantly larger than DMXF — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- SUSA covers north america markets; DMXF covers global.
- Over the last 3 years, SUSA has delivered higher annualized returns.
- SUSA has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| SUSA | DMXF | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.25% | 0.12% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $3.8B | $992M |
| Since | 2005 | 2020 |
| Dividend yield | 0.88% | 4.52% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +26.3% | +19.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | +21.3% | +14.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | +11.9% | +7.3% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.13 | 0.70 |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.47% | 16.16% |
| Max drawdown | -32.93% | -34.52% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to SUSA and DMXF
Explore further