Screener
SUSB vs EAOA
iShares ESG 1-5 Year USD Corporate Bond ETF vs iShares ESG Aware 80/20 Aggressive Allocation ETF
Key differences
- SUSB costs 0.06% less per year.
- SUSB is significantly larger than EAOA — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- SUSB is classified as fixed income, while EAOA is mixed asset — different risk/return profiles.
- Over the last 3 years, EAOA has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| SUSB | EAOA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.12% | 0.18% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.1B | $36M |
| Since | 2017 | 2020 |
| Dividend yield | 4.49% | 2.03% |
| Asset class | fixed income | mixed asset |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +4.8% | +24.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +5.3% | +17.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | +2.2% | +8.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.64 | 1.10 |
| Volatility 1Y | 1.94% | 10.80% |
| Max drawdown | -13.25% | -25.06% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to SUSB and EAOA
Explore further