Screener
SUSC vs GIGL
iShares ESG USD Corporate Bond ETF vs Goldman Sachs Corporate Bond ETF
Key differences
Both SUSC and GIGL are fixed income ETFs. SUSC charges 0.18% a year and GIGL 0.29%. The main difference: SUSC follows a index tracking strategy; GIGL uses active selection.
- SUSC follows a index tracking strategy; GIGL uses active selection.
- SUSC costs 0.11% less per year.
- SUSC is much larger than GIGL. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- SUSC has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| SUSC | GIGL | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.18% | 0.29% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.4B | $187M |
| Since | 2017 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 4.45% | — |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +5.5% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +5.5% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +0.4% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.32 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 4.41% | — |
| Max drawdown | -22.41% | -3.13% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.