Screener
SUSL vs EMXF
iShares ESG MSCI USA Leaders ETF vs iShares ESG Advanced MSCI EM ETF
Key differences
- SUSL costs 0.06% less per year.
- SUSL is significantly larger than EMXF — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- SUSL covers north america markets; EMXF covers emerging markets.
- SUSL follows a active selection strategy; EMXF uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, SUSL has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| SUSL | EMXF | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.10% | 0.16% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.1B | $148M |
| Since | 2019 | 2020 |
| Dividend yield | 0.97% | 3.03% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | emerging markets |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +29.8% | +45.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | +23.6% | +21.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | +14.1% | +8.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.20 | 1.01 |
| Volatility 1Y | 13.10% | 18.54% |
| Max drawdown | -34.26% | -33.13% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to SUSL and EMXF
Explore further