Skip to content
Screener

SWP vs SDVD

SWP Growth & Income ETF vs FT Vest SMID Rising Dividend Achievers Target Income ETF

SWP

SWP Growth & Income ETF

Annual cost

0.99%

Fund size

$154M

SDVD

FT Vest SMID Rising Dividend Achievers Target Income ETF

Annual cost

0.85%

Fund size

$831M

Key differences

Both SWP and SDVD are alternative ETFs. SWP charges 0.99% a year and SDVD 0.85%. The main difference: SDVD costs 0.14% less per year.

  • SDVD costs 0.14% less per year.
  • SDVD is much larger than SWP. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.

Side-by-side comparison

SWPSDVD
Annual cost (TER)0.99%0.85%
Fund size (AUM)$154M$831M
Since20242023
Dividend yield3.94%8.25%
Asset classalternativealternative
Regionnorth americanorth america
Strategyoption incomeoption income
CAGR 1Y+21.1%+22.6%
CAGR 3YN/AN/A
CAGR 5YN/AN/A
Sharpe 3YN/AN/A
Volatility 1Y12.08%14.42%
Max drawdown-16.41%-24.60%

Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.

Similar to SWP and SDVD