Screener
SYSB vs BINC
iShares Systematic Bond ETF vs iShares Flexible Income Active ETF
Key differences
- SYSB costs 0.15% less per year.
- BINC is significantly larger than SYSB — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- SYSB follows a index tracking strategy; BINC uses active selection.
- SYSB has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| SYSB | BINC | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.25% | 0.40% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.0B | $16.9B |
| Since | 2015 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | 4.64% | 5.60% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +5.7% | +6.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | +6.5% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +1.5% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.66 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 3.78% | 2.29% |
| Max drawdown | -18.47% | -2.69% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to SYSB and BINC
Explore further