Screener
SZK vs GXPS
ProShares UltraShort Consumer Staples vs Global X Purecap MSCI Consumer Staples ETF
Key differences
- GXPS costs 0.80% less per year.
- GXPS is significantly larger than SZK — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- SZK follows a inverse strategy; GXPS uses index tracking.
- SZK has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| SZK | GXPS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.95% | 0.15% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $5M | $54M |
| Since | 2007 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 2.80% | — |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | inverse | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | -6.2% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | -4.2% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | -5.5% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | -0.20 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 24.61% | — |
| Max drawdown | -86.79% | -9.20% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to SZK and GXPS
Explore further