Screener
TACU vs TEQI
T. Rowe Price Active Core U.S. Equity ETF vs T. Rowe Price Equity Income ETF
Key differences
- TACU costs 0.54% less per year.
- TEQI is significantly larger than TACU — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- TACU follows a index tracking strategy; TEQI uses active selection.
- TEQI has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| TACU | TEQI | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.00% | 0.54% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $14M | $403M |
| Since | 2025 | 2020 |
| Dividend yield | — | 1.57% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +24.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +16.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +9.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.99 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 10.61% |
| Max drawdown | -8.91% | -17.82% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to TACU and TEQI
Explore further