Screener
TACU vs TGRW
T. Rowe Price Active Core U.S. Equity ETF vs T. Rowe Price Growth Stock ETF
Key differences
- TACU costs 0.52% less per year.
- TGRW is significantly larger than TACU — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- TACU follows a index tracking strategy; TGRW uses active selection.
- TGRW has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| TACU | TGRW | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.00% | 0.52% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $14M | $972M |
| Since | 2025 | 2020 |
| Dividend yield | — | 0.00% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +23.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +23.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +10.0% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.00 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 16.62% |
| Max drawdown | -8.91% | -43.33% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to TACU and TGRW
Explore further