Screener
TAN vs ICLN
Invesco Solar ETF vs iShares Global Clean Energy ETF
Key differences
- ICLN costs 0.31% less per year.
- Over the last 3 years, ICLN has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| TAN | ICLN | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.70% | 0.39% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.6B | $2.5B |
| Since | 2008 | 2008 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 1.30% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +94.1% | +78.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | -2.5% | +7.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | -1.4% | +2.3% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.03 | 0.27 |
| Volatility 1Y | 37.40% | 25.99% |
| Max drawdown | -78.53% | -66.75% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to TAN and ICLN
Explore further