Screener
TAN vs PRN
Invesco Solar ETF vs Invesco Dorsey Wright Industrials Momentum ETF
Key differences
- PRN costs 0.10% less per year.
- TAN is significantly larger than PRN — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, PRN has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| TAN | PRN | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.70% | 0.60% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.6B | $401M |
| Since | 2008 | 2006 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.12% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +94.1% | +62.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | -2.5% | +35.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | -1.4% | +19.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.03 | 1.19 |
| Volatility 1Y | 37.40% | 28.32% |
| Max drawdown | -78.53% | -36.27% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to TAN and PRN
Explore further