Screener
TAN vs QQMG
Invesco Solar ETF vs Invesco ESG NASDAQ 100 ETF
Key differences
- QQMG costs 0.50% less per year.
- TAN is significantly larger than QQMG — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, QQMG has delivered higher annualized returns.
- TAN has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| TAN | QQMG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.70% | 0.20% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.6B | $187M |
| Since | 2008 | 2021 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.38% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +94.1% | +42.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | -2.5% | +31.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | -1.4% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.03 | 1.26 |
| Volatility 1Y | 37.40% | 16.91% |
| Max drawdown | -78.53% | -35.43% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to TAN and QQMG
Explore further