Screener
TAN vs RSP
Invesco Solar ETF vs Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF
Key differences
- RSP costs 0.50% less per year.
- RSP is significantly larger than TAN — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- TAN follows a index tracking strategy; RSP uses index enhanced.
- Over the last 3 years, RSP has delivered higher annualized returns.
- RSP has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| TAN | RSP | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.70% | 0.20% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.6B | $86.4B |
| Since | 2008 | 2003 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 1.53% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index enhanced |
| CAGR 1Y | +122.2% | +21.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +0.4% | +15.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | -1.1% | +8.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.11 | 0.83 |
| Volatility 1Y | 36.88% | 11.72% |
| Max drawdown | -78.53% | -39.04% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to TAN and RSP
Explore further