Screener
TAXF vs GHYB
American Century Diversified Municipal Bond ETF vs Goldman Sachs Access High Yield Corporate Bond ETF
Key differences
- GHYB costs 0.12% less per year.
- TAXF is significantly larger than GHYB — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- TAXF follows a active selection strategy; GHYB uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, GHYB has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| TAXF | GHYB | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.27% | 0.15% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $627M | $124M |
| Since | 2018 | 2017 |
| Dividend yield | 3.82% | 7.00% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +7.8% | +7.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | +4.2% | +8.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | +1.1% | +4.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.15 | 0.93 |
| Volatility 1Y | 3.13% | 3.52% |
| Max drawdown | -13.94% | -21.48% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to TAXF and GHYB
Explore further